Since then, Samsung has counter-sued the iPhone makers, additionally citation apparent infringement. Now that the 2 companies accept played ‘if you appearance me yours, I’ll appearance you mine‘ for the accomplished week, Samsung’s J.K. Shin tells the WSJ his thoughts on the lawsuit…
Shin, who is admiral of Samsung’s adaptable communications, has enjoyed some austere success lately. The company’s fresh Galaxy S II smartphone has awash over a actor units in its abbreviate time on the bazaar and analysts peg the architect as the 2nd arch book maker, abaft Apple.
Though I don’t agnosticism that Samsung will get little added than a bang of the wrist on this one, I can’t accept Shin can be so nonchalant. Look at the aloft photo of a Samsung home theatre alien and acquaint me that it aloof has a “similar design” to the iPhone 4.
The altercation amid the 2 companies is not alone absorbing because the Samsung articles absolutely do buck a arresting affinity to Apple’s, but additionally because the 2 firms are cogent partners. Samsung food Apple with assorted apparatus for a array of products, including iPhones.
It’ll be absorbing to see how this one plays out, as archetypal apparent infringements assume to be a amplitude of the law. Apple’s case however, absolutely seems to authority water, so the judge’s cardinal could accept a cogent ripple effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment